LOCALS ONLY
Atlanta Biennial’s broad reach nets a mixed bag at the Contemporary
Page 61 Creative Loafing - apr.2- apr.8, 2003
By Felicia Feaster
There are a number of reasons to admire the efforts of New York critic
Franklin Sirmans to represent a cross-section of Atlanta artists for the
Atlanta Contemporary Art Center’s 2003 Biennial exhibition.
Sirmans has made an obvious effort – in an art world often hung
up on young, trendy, Next Big Thing artists – to represent mature,
culturally diverse and self-taught artists, as well as a range of styles
and media, from drawing, sculpture, video and painting to formalist and
conceptual work.
But the Catch-22 of showing such a broad range of artists and styles is
how frustratingly scrambled this biennial feels. With its discordant mix,
it’s often hard to get a good sense of the real connective tissue
beneath Sirmans’ desire to be inclusive.
Sirmans has managed to sniff out an impressive number of Atlanta’s
established and rising talents, including, among others Sara Hornbacher,
Donald Locke, Hope Hilton, Michael Gibson, Kathryn Refi and Alex Kvares
as well as some promising exploratory work from Emily Diehl and Rusty
Wallace. But there is also a fair amount of mediocre work that may not
be the best representation of either the artist in question (several artists
are underrepresented with just one piece) or the local art scene.
Not that there aren’t serendipitous and inspired choices, For instance,
the placement of Larry Walker’s and Eric Mack’s works on opposite
walls of the main gallery draws out fascinating differences in their approach
to the modern, post-industrial fracas . Walker’s street scenes littered
with pornography, want ads, lost pet notices, advertisements and movie
posters is a culture of disturbing overload – a bleating mania that
suggests an artist critiquing the comparable effect on our brains.
But in the equally frenetic melee of Mack’s collages, the effect
is quite different. In Mack’s cool, controlled grids, reminiscent
of colorful roadmaps or computer circuitry, he suggest a completely different
vantage.
Mack approaches the same mania with a sense of wonder. He displays a
higher comfort level with technology and the psychedelic blur of a culture
on overdrive, which underscores a distinctly generational divide between
the two artists.
Article truncated.
|